甲:原式 乙:原式
丙:原式 ?。涸?img class="mathml" src="http://math.21cnjy.com/MathMLToImage?mml=%3Cmath+xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F1998%2FMath%2FMathML%22%3E%3Cmrow%3E%3Cmo%3E%3D%3C%2Fmo%3E%3Cmfrac%3E%3Cmrow%3E%3Cmi%3Ea%3C%2Fmi%3E%3Cmo%3E%E2%88%92%3C%2Fmo%3E%3Cmi%3Ea%3C%2Fmi%3E%3Cmo%3E%2B%3C%2Fmo%3E%3Cmi%3Eb%3C%2Fmi%3E%3C%2Fmrow%3E%3Cmrow%3E%3Cmi%3Ea%3C%2Fmi%3E%3Cmo%3E%E2%88%92%3C%2Fmo%3E%3Cmi%3Eb%3C%2Fmi%3E%3C%2Fmrow%3E%3C%2Fmfrac%3E%3Cmo%3E%E2%8B%85%3C%2Fmo%3E%3Cmfrac%3E%3Cmrow%3E%3Cmsup%3E%3Cmi%3Ea%3C%2Fmi%3E%3Cmn%3E2%3C%2Fmn%3E%3C%2Fmsup%3E%3Cmo%3E%E2%88%92%3C%2Fmo%3E%3Cmsup%3E%3Cmi%3Eb%3C%2Fmi%3E%3Cmn%3E2%3C%2Fmn%3E%3C%2Fmsup%3E%3C%2Fmrow%3E%3Cmi%3Eb%3C%2Fmi%3E%3C%2Fmfrac%3E%3C%2Fmrow%3E%3C%2Fmath%3E" style="max-width:100%;vertical-align: middle;">
其中正確的是( )
①分別在BA和CA上取
②在BC上取
③連接DE、FG,量出DE的長(zhǎng)為a米,F(xiàn)G的長(zhǎng)為b米.
若 , 則說明和是相等的,他的這種做法合理嗎?為什么?
(2)類比猜想:如圖②,當(dāng)動(dòng)點(diǎn)D運(yùn)動(dòng)至等邊三角形ABC邊BA的延長(zhǎng)線上時(shí),其他作法與(1)相同,猜想AF與BD在(1)中的結(jié)論是否仍然成立?
(3)深入探究:
Ⅰ.如圖③,當(dāng)動(dòng)點(diǎn)D在等邊三角形ABC邊BA上運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí)(點(diǎn)D與點(diǎn)B不重合),連接DC,以DC為邊在DC上方、下方分別作等邊三角形DCF和等邊三角形DCF' , 連接AF、BF' , 探究AF、BF'與AB有何數(shù)量關(guān)系?并證明你探究的結(jié)論.
Ⅱ.如圖④,當(dāng)動(dòng)點(diǎn)D在等邊三角形邊BA的延長(zhǎng)線上運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí),其他作法與圖③相同,Ⅰ中的結(jié)論是否成立?若不成立,是否有新的結(jié)論?并證明你得出的結(jié)論.